Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael's avatar

As usual, a smogasbord of really good news to start our day. Looks like Texas has learned the lessons of their disastrous fling with fossil fuels. On their way to becoming a major exporter of clean energy! From the wonderful revival of the whales to the winsome and charismatic toadfish-a lot of good stuff this week!

Expand full comment
Jane none of your businesss's avatar

Love the whole of this column except this bit that I need to call out. Don’t call us progressives and don’t call anyone deeply misguided. Or: do that and show the world who you are, not who they are. (For an example, birds matter. Situating of turbines matters. Colour of turbine blades matters. Using radar to detect and slow down/stop turbines during bird and bat events, matters. We’ve known this for 10+ years and we still play the same nonsense push-paper/narrative games, to avoid just taking pragmatic actions. Saying “don’t kill birds here” is not deeply misguided!)

Parsing environmentalism into left-right narratives is complete and utter warfare on the planet, and not just the planet, for every topic under the sun: It occurred to me about a decade ago (and as things usually occur to me a decade before everyone else starts head-scratching and thinking “but wait…” and I’m waiting for the shoe to drop) that political branding and marketing is exactly that, political branding and marketing. What folly y’all are practicing to allow it any play in your own lives, and in not holding your political “representative” to account over it. 1) The world is full of actual problems and so should be overwhelmingly focused on the efforts to solve them, not gallery-commentary / hand-waving about them, and 2) your democratically-elected, or even imposed, representative is there to represent you as their constituent, regardless of whether the lot of you agree, and make sure that you are listened to and your concerns conveyed into the process – but their job is to see a line through competing interests and negotiate an acceptable mandate to solve the problem, or at least come up with the best alternative to a negotiated agreement. So that means everybody needs to Cut It Out with this nonsense, manufactured “progressive” “conservative” wah wah wah and really try to describe the complexities of issues from all angles. You will need them all to get that BATNA.

Almost all of these political narratives amounts to people running away with group/ running away from their own psychology, with the bottom line, in this budget-built civil society, being the cleverest bodies competing for rents and incentives (and, basically, the last oxygen in the tank). All we see is about 60-80% You/Me problems and 40%-20% Actual Problems, some of which are caused by You/Me problems. With over a century of science and well over a millennia of philosophy about understanding how humans think and behave, anyone who can’t figure out what is a You/Me problem over a Real World problem is part of the problem. Those who aren’t part of that problem, are still part of the problem, if they do not extend the critically important psychological and human-resource skill of Putting the You/Me people to Work on the Real problems to the best of their capacity. This is also the productive juncture at which one can limit the scope of how You/Me people impose You/Me problems onto things they have no business distorting; we’ve all seen and dealt with this during the normal course of business (notwithstanding academia and places where funding is hidden and clients are tractable). Good productive work will take care of that, and after a few years, former You/Me people turn into reasonable Real Problem solvers.

The most able, the most responsible, of us need to attend to what’s coming down the pipe, and to be such an adult, you have to be the most prepared to accept the outside perspective. And you don’t do that if you’re entrenched in your worldview.

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts